Wow, my first post talking about current events....it's almost like I'm caught up in my blog (but in reality, I still am behind at least 3 posts).
It's just before the weekend, and I'm kindof in the eye of the storm at work right now, so I thought that I'd give a little update for my Hinf cohort, and for Dave, who told me that I need more work information in here for me to use this as my co-op report.
Over the past few weeks, I have been mainly working on 4 different tasks here at empirica. My main task has been working on a report for the European Commission regarding the current and future status of e-Health standards and standard development organizations (SDOs). For the most part, as explained earlier, this has involved a lot of research, and a lot of getting up to speed on the myriad of different e-Health standards that are out there in the world. Probably the main challenge that I faced, whilst working on this task, was the fact that there is a real lack of critical information about the standards and their development organizations available. In fact, for the most part, the only information that you can find on a standard, is the information that its development organization puts out. This makes assessment incredibly challenging, considering the obvious bias that a SDO would have regarding the information that they release about their own standard.
To give us a more critical view of the standards and SDOs, empirica chose to conduct an online survey of e-Health experts around the world, to get their opinion on how the current and future e-Health standards game is actually played out - my second job. This was an interesting task to undertake in that the survey tool that I worked with,
Limesurvey, has a lot of features, and with a lot of features comes a lot of understanding. Also, the fact that this survey was going to be released to top experts and industry leaders around the world (i.e. CIOs, ministries of health, etc) with empirica's name on it, the survey was going to have to be flawless. It was my responsibility to actually implement the survey with the Limesurvey tool, which was set up on a local empirica server. It took a while to get use to, especially compared with some of the more user friendly, plug and play type surveys like surveymonkey, but after a while, even I was impressed with the types of things Limesurvey was capable of. With the tool, you can use html and css programming to create templates for the aesthetic design of the survey, then with those templates, you can add in numerous different types of questions (i.e. drop boxes, tick boxes, text boxes.....pretty much any type of box the heart desires....;) Another cool feature is that you can use regular expressions to perform validity checks on the text boxes. It had been a while since I had written any regular expressions, so that was another thing that took me a while, but once I got the hang of it, it was quite cool! To run a survey, you can either open it up to the public, or create a user 'token' table, which assigns one token to every user that you want to use the survey, and those users can only use their token one time, creating a secure, closed access survey. Once a survey is up and running, you can monitor the progress on the survey, run queries for stats on the answers that are coming back, send automated invitations and reminders for people to fill out the survey, and much much more. The main flaw in Limesurvey, thus far, is the fact that a user needs to have cookies enabled in their web browser when they are filling out the survey, and since a lot of businesses regulate whether or not their employees can have cookies excepted on their work computers, a lot of people are left not being able to complete the survey due to these policy reasons. The survey is currently out and we are waiting for our responses to come back before we start running our analysis of the results.
The third, and probably the most interesting task that I am working on, is the conduction of expert telephone interviews, again to gain more critical insight on the standardization situation. Again, this is polling experts, but instead of using the online survey, we are going more in depth, by using a semi-structured interview to gather the information. I helped create the questions for the interviews, and I also get to be one of the participants during the interview, which is quite interesting hearing the opinions of the world leaders in my field. It's also quite interesting to get the European prospective on things during these interviews. During the first interview I was involved in, I was made aware of the idea that e-Health standardization (or lack thereof) may be more of a market issue, rather than a complexity issue, and to get even more into detail, it may be an issue of battling for market dominance between North America (i.e. HL7) and Europe (i.e. CEN). This is something that I never really thought of before, nor is it something that I really think is the actual case (entirely), but it's an interesting opinion to take, and could be debated at length, but I'll leave it at that.
The last task that I was working on isn't quite interesting enough to mention at length (like all jobs, not everything can be interesting), but it basically involves editing.
Since I only really have about a month left here, I guess I still have my work cut out for me. Next week, I'm going to be giving a presentation to the staff at empirica regarding the use of the Limesurvey tool, which I had been working with over the past month or so. With that, I will be creating a guide of use for whoever takes my place on this survey role. I have also been told that I will be given the opportunity to work on a couple of other different projects here. Probably what I am most excited about is that I will (hopefully) get the chance to sit in on a meeting where international policy decisions are going to be made (it was one of my co-op work term requests). I haven't been informed of when or where this meeting will be taking place yet, but I will surely keep you posted.
Last but not least, Dave wanted me to write a quick blurb about who empirica is, and what empirica does, so here it is:
empirica has been in operation for (as far as I know) around 25 years or so. It is a consulting firm for projects relating to concept development, the application and development of new information and communication technology, and the information society. The bulk of project work, and project funding is granted by the European Commission. There are currently 38 permanent employees listed on the empirica web site; however, there are also quite a few student interns at the company as well. empirica projects are far reaching, giving them partners in the following countries:
(taken from empirica.biz)

Working at empirica is very interesting and very rewarding. I'm gaining a lot of knowledge about my field that I would not have been able to get anywhere else.
That's it for the work posts for now.
To be continued.......